Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People, Respondent, v. E. Remington & Sons, Respondents; In the Matter of the Application of John B. Wells and others, Creditors of E. Remington & Sons, to Compel Payment of their Claims under and by virtue of chapter 376 of the Laws of 1885, 1888 — 109 N.Y. 631 · caselaw · US
Corporations
The People, Respondent, v. E. Remington & Sons, Respondents; In the Matter of the Application of John B. Wells and others, Creditors of E. Remington & Sons, to Compel Payment of their Claims under and by virtue of chapter 376 of the Laws of 1885
109 N.Y. 631·New York Court of Appeals·1888·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People, Respondent, v. E. Remington & Sons, Respondents. In the Matter of the Application of John B. Wells and others, Creditors of E. Remington & Sons, to Compel Payment of their Claims under and by virtue of chapter 376 of the Laws of 1885.
(Argued February 28, 1888;
decided April 10, 1888.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, made July 1, 1887, which reversed an order of Special Term adjudging certain creditors of the defendant corporation entitled to a preference, and affirmed said order in other respects.
Edwin H. Risley for appellants.
Charles F. Tabor, attorney-general, for the People, respondent.
Francis Kernam, and Thomas Richardson for the receivers, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur, except Earl, J., not sitting.
Order affirmed.