Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Bethel v. Lloyd and others, 1759 — 1 U.S. 2 · caselaw · US
Property · MBE-tested
Bethel v. Lloyd and others
1 U.S. 21 Dall. 2·Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·1759·PA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Bethel v. Lloyd and others.
Partition.
Under the plea of non tenent insimul, the defendants may show that some of them are not tenants of the freehold.
[MAJORITY]
Partition. Plea non tenent insimul, &c. Defendants permitted to give in evidence to the jury, that some of them were not tenants of the freehold, but only tenants at will.
Cro. Eliz. 759.
5) See Bates v. McCrory, 3 Yeates 192; M'Kee v. Straub, 2 Binn. 1.