Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Nebraska Press Assn. et al. v. Stuart, Judge, 1975 — 423 U.S. 1010 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Nebraska Press Assn. et al. v. Stuart, Judge
423 U.S. 1010·Supreme Court of the United States·1975
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. A-426.
Nebraska Press Assn. et al. v. Stuart, Judge.
[See No. A-513, infra.]
[MAJORITY]
On November 21, 1975, applicants filed a motion with the full Court to vacate in part Mr. Justice Black-mun’s stay order filed herein on November 20, 1975. Inasmuch as the order of November 20 was directed solely to the order dated October 27, 1975, of the District Court of Lincoln County, Neb., and by its terms was subject to such action as might subsequently be taken by the Supreme Court of Nebraska, and inasmuch as the Supreme Court of Nebraska on December 1 issued its order in the matter and Mr. Justice Blackmun’s order has thereby expired and is no longer effective, applicants’ motion is denied. Denial of this application is without prejudice to the Court’s consideration of the applicants’ further application for stays and for other relief filed with this Court on December 4, 1975, and presently pending.