Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
WYNN et al. v. BYRNE, COUNTY PROSECUTOR, 1968 — 390 U.S. 197 · caselaw · US
General
WYNN et al. v. BYRNE, COUNTY PROSECUTOR
390 U.S. 197·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Mr. Justice Black would .affirm the judgment.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
WYNN et al. v. BYRNE, COUNTY PROSECUTOR.
No. 977.
Decided March 4, 1968.
Robert L. Carter, Martin Garbus and Morton Stavis for appellants.
Thomas P. Ford, Jr., for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The judgment of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey is vacated and the cause is remanded to that court for further proceedings. Moody v. Flowers, 387 U. S. 97, at 104.
Mr. Justice Black would .affirm the judgment.