Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
BANK OF NEW ORLEANS v. CALDWELL, 1873 — 154 U.S. 592 · caselaw · US
General
BANK OF NEW ORLEANS v. CALDWELL
154 U.S. 59221 L. Ed. 305·Supreme Court of the United States·1873
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
BANK OF NEW ORLEANS v. CALDWELL.
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA.
No. 255.
Submitted January 28, 1873.
Decided March 3, 1873.
This case is dismissed without an opinion, as no exceptions appear to have been taken during the trial.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Chief Justice Chase]
Mr. Chief Justice Chase
delivered the opinion of the court.
Mr. William M. Ewarts and Mr. J. Hubley Ashton for plaintiff in error.
Mr. P. Phillips for defendants in error.
Ordered, by the court, that the judgment of the Circuit Court for the District of Louisiana be affirmed, without an opinion, no bill of exceptions appearing to have been' taken during the progress of the trial.