Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Charles T. Barney, as Administrator, etc., Appellant, v. The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, Respondent, 1895 — 146 N.Y. 364 · caselaw · US
General
Charles T. Barney, as Administrator, etc., Appellant, v. The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, Respondent
146 N.Y. 364·New York Court of Appeals·1895·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles T. Barney, as Administrator, etc., Appellant, v. The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, Respondent.
(Argued April 9, 1895;
decided April 23, 1895.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Sujireme Court in the first judicial department, made May 18, 1894, which sustained defendant’s exceptions and granted a motion for a new trial.
James A. Jeering for appellant.
David J. Dean for respondent.
Reported below, 78 Hun, 336.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur.
Order affirmed.