Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
WASHUM, dba LOS ANGELES-YUMA FREIGHT LINES, et al. v. UNITED STATES et al., 1969 — 396 U.S. 18 · caselaw · US
General
WASHUM, dba LOS ANGELES-YUMA FREIGHT LINES, et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
396 U.S. 18·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
WASHUM, dba LOS ANGELES-YUMA FREIGHT LINES, et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 374.
Decided October 27, 1969
James W. Wrape and Robert E. Joyner for appellants.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Robert W. Ginnane, and Nahum Litt for the United States et al., and Robert F. Schureman for Consolidated Copperstate Lines et al., appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.