Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General Motors Acceptance Corporation et al. v. Hulbert, County Assessor of Canadian County, 1942 — 317 U.S. 590 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
General Motors Acceptance Corporation et al. v. Hulbert, County Assessor of Canadian County
317 U.S. 590·Supreme Court of the United States·1942
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 280.
General Motors Acceptance Corporation et al. v. Hulbert, County Assessor of Canadian County.
October 12, 1942.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Columbus Southern Railway Co. v. Wright, 151 U. S. 470, 478-83; General American Tank Car Corp. v. Day, 270 U. S. 367, 372. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Mr. D. I. Johnston for appellants. Messrs. Mac Q. Williamson, Attorney General of Oklahoma, and Bandell S. Cobb for appellee.