Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Federal Power Commission v. Texaco Inc. et al., 1964 — 376 U.S. 940 · caselaw · US
General
Federal Power Commission v. Texaco Inc. et al.
376 U.S. 940·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 386.
Federal Power Commission v. Texaco Inc. et al.
J. Calvin Simpson and John T. Murphy on the motion. Alfred, C. DeCrane, Jr., W. W. Heard, Wm. H. Emerson, William J. Grove, Thomas H. Wall and Carroll L. Gilliam for respondents, in opposition.
[MAJORITY]
Certiorari, 375 U. S. 902, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. The motion of the People of the State of California and Public Utilities Commission of California for leave to file a brief, as amici curiae, is granted.