Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
C. F. Harms Company, Libelant Appellant, v. Steam Tug ALLENTOWN, Her Engines, etc.; Annie O'Neill, Claimant Appellee, 1925 — 9 F.2d 1016 · caselaw · US
General
C. F. Harms Company, Libelant Appellant, v. Steam Tug ALLENTOWN, Her Engines, etc.; Annie O'Neill, Claimant Appellee
9 F.2d 1016·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1925
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
C. F. Harms Company, Libelant Appellant, v. Steam Tug ALLENTOWN, Her Engines, etc.; Annie O’Neill, Claimant Appellee.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
November 16, 1925.)
No. 61.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Park, Mattison & Lynch, of New York City (Frank P. Treanor, Jr., of New York City, advocate), for libelant appellant.
Alexander & Ash, of New York City (Mark Ash and Edward Ash, both of New York City, of counsel), for claimant appellee.
Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and MANTON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decree affirmed.