Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People, ex rel. The Ogdensburgh and Lake Champlain Railroad Company, Respondent, v. George K. Pond et al., Assessors, etc., Appellants, 1883 — 92 N.Y. 643 · caselaw · US
General
The People, ex rel. The Ogdensburgh and Lake Champlain Railroad Company, Respondent, v. George K. Pond et al., Assessors, etc., Appellants
92 N.Y. 643·New York Court of Appeals·1883·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People, ex rel. The Ogdensburgh and Lake Champlain Railroad Company, Respondent, v. George K. Pond et al., Assessors, etc., Appellants.
(Argued April 17, 1883;
decided April 24, 1883.)
This was an appeal from an order of General Term, which affirmed an order of Special Term made in proceedings by certiorari under chapter 269, Laws of 1880, to review and correct an alleged erroneous assessment.
The appeal was dismissed on the ground that there was sufficient evidence to authorize the Supreme .Court to exercise its discretionary power.
John P. Badger for appellant.
Louis Haslrouck for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss; no opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.