General
Cheltenham & Abington Sewerage Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission et al.; Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Cheltenham & Abington Sewerage Co.
317 U.S. 588·Supreme Court of the United States·1942
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 160.
Cheltenham & Abington Sewerage Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission et al. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Cheltenham & Abington Sewerage Co.
No. 169.
October 12, 1942.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
In No. 160 the appeal is dismissed, and in No. 169 the petition for writ of certiorari is denied, for want of a final judgment. Grays Harbor Logging Co. v. Coats-Fordney Co., 243 U. S. 251; Wick v. Superior Court, 278 U. S. 575.
Mr. George Henry Huft for appellant in No. 160 and respondent in No. 169. Mr. Thomas A. Foulke for Benjamin H. Davis et al., appellees in No. 160. Messrs. Claude T. Reno, Harry M. Showalter, Samuel Graff Miller, and Herbert S. Levy for the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission.