General
Eliza Poland, Respondent, v. United Traction Company, Appellant
177 N.Y. 557·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Eliza Poland, Respondent, v. United Traction Company, Appellant.
Poland v. United Traction Go., 88 App. Div. 281, affirmed.
(Argued January 4, 1904;
decided January 19, 1904.)
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered November 13, 1903, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion for a change of venue.
The following question was certified: “ Is the county of Rensselaer a proper county for the trial of this action upon the facts as disclosed in the record on appeal herein.”
Pabrick G. Dugan for appellant.
G. B. Wellington for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative on opinion below.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Bartlett, Martin, Vann and Cullen, JJ. Absent: O’Brien and Werner, JJ.