General
Lisenba v. California
311 U.S. 617·Supreme Court of the United States·1940
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nos. 133 and 134.
Lisenba v. California.
October 28, 1940.
Mr. Morris Lavine for appellant.
[MAJORITY]
Appeals from the Supreme Court of California.
The motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis are granted. The appeals aré dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Section 237 (a), Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925. Treating the papers whereon the appeals were allowed as petitions for writs, of certiorari, as required by § 237 (c) of the Judicial Code (43 Stat. 936, 938), certiorari is granted.