Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
AMY AND VICKY, CHILD PORNOGRAPHY VICTIMS, petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, et al., 2014 — 572 U.S. 1083 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
AMY AND VICKY, CHILD PORNOGRAPHY VICTIMS, petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, et al.
572 U.S. 1083188 L. Ed. 2d 955·Supreme Court of the United States·2014
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
AMY AND VICKY, CHILD PORNOGRAPHY VICTIMS, petitioners,
v.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, et al.
No. 12-651.
Supreme Court of the United States
April 28, 2014.
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Motion of National Crime Victim Law Institute for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Paroline v. United States, 572 U.S. ----, 134 S.Ct. 1710, 188 L.Ed.2d 714 (2014).