Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Henry L. Herbert et al., Respondents, v. John Duryea, Appellant, 1900 — 164 N.Y. 596 · caselaw · US
General
Henry L. Herbert et al., Respondents, v. John Duryea, Appellant
164 N.Y. 596·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Henry L. Herbert et al., Respondents, v. John Duryea, Appellant.
Herbert v. Duryea, 34 App. Div. 478, affirmed.
(Argued October 19, 1900;
decided November 2, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the .Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 23,1898, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered- upon a verdict directed by the court.
jReuben Leslie Maynard for appellant.
Jacob Maries for 'respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Bartlett, Martin, Yann, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Not voting: Parker, Oh. J., and Gray, J.