Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John Collins, Respondent, v. Stephen A. Ralli et al., Appellants, 1881 — 85 N.Y. 637 · caselaw · US
General
John Collins, Respondent, v. Stephen A. Ralli et al., Appellants
85 N.Y. 637·New York Court of Appeals·1881·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John Collins, Respondent, v. Stephen A. Ralli et al., Appellants.
(Argued May 7, 1881;
decided May 31, 1881.)
Reported below (20 Hun, 246).
Coudert Brothers for appellants.
Freling H. Smith for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Mem. for affirmance on opinion of Pratt, J., in court below.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.