Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
J. W. Toney et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The Mayor and City Council of the City of Macon, 1904 — 195 U.S. 625 · caselaw · US
General
J. W. Toney et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The Mayor and City Council of the City of Macon
195 U.S. 625·Supreme Court of the United States·1904
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 214.
J. W. Toney et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The Mayor and City Council of the City of Macon.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Georgia.
Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted November 28, 1904.
Decided December 5, 1904.
Mr. John Randolph Cooper for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. Minter Wimberly for defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction on the Authority of Meagher v. Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Company, 145 U. S. 608, 611; Haseltine v. Central Bank, 183 U. S. 130, and cases cited. See Charleston, etc., Railway Co. v. Miller, 115 Georgia, 92; Augusta Railway Company v. Andrews, 92 Georgia, 706.