Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John Long et al., Respondents, v. The Western Railroad Corporation, Appellant, 1873 — 55 N.Y. 633 · caselaw · US
Corporations
John Long et al., Respondents, v. The Western Railroad Corporation, Appellant
55 N.Y. 633·New York Court of Appeals·1873·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John Long et al., Respondents, v. The Western Railroad Corporation, Appellant.
(Argued October 8, 1873;
decided November 11, 1873.)
George W. Miller for the appellant.
Amasa J. Parker for the respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm, on opinion of Daniels, J., in court below. All concur.
Judgment affirmed.