Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Pacific Far East Line, Inc., v. United States et al., 1958 — 358 U.S. 866 · caselaw · US
Admiralty
Pacific Far East Line, Inc., v. United States et al.
358 U.S. 866·Supreme Court of the United States·1958
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 319.
Pacific Far East Line, Inc., v. United States et al.
Odell Kominers for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Daniel M. Friedman, E. Robert Seaver, Robert E. Mitchell, Edward Aptaker and Edward Schmeltzer for the United States and the Federal Maritime Board, and Alvin J. Rockwell and William R. Deming for the Matson Navigation Co., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.