Contracts · MBE-tested
ESTATE OF LEYMAN v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
383 U.S. 832·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ESTATE OF LEYMAN v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.
No. 385.
Decided April 4, 1966.
Daniel M. Gribbon, William, H. Allen and Matthew J. Zinn for petitioner.
Solicitor General Marshall for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Upon the consent of the Solicitor General and consideration of the entire record, the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is vacated and the cause is remanded to that court with instructions to remand it to the United States Tax Court for computation and imposition of civil fraud penalty in accordance with the provisions of Public Law 89-359, 80 Stat. 28.