Administrative
Eunice A. Bigelow, v. Sarah J. Doying et al., Impleaded, etc., Respondents, The Bloomingdale Store and Apartment Company, Appellant
129 N.Y. 640·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Eunice A. Bigelow, v. Sarah J. Doying et al., Impleaded, etc., Respondents, The Bloomingdale Store and Apartment Company, Appellant.
(Submitted November 30, 1891;
decided December 15, 1891.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made March 3, 1891, which affirmed an order of Special Term reversing the report of,a referee as to surplus moneys and appointing a new referee.
John C. Shaw for appellant.
James P. Campbell for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal on ground that order appealed from is not final; no opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.