General
David A. Lamming, Appellant, v. Norman H. Galusha et al., Respondents
151 N.Y. 648·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
David A. Lamming, Appellant, v. Norman H. Galusha et al., Respondents.
Lemming v. Galusha, 81 Hun, 247, affirmed.
(Argued December 9, 1896;
decided December 24, 1896.)
Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered October 26, 1894, which affirmed a judgment in favor of .defendants entered upon a decision of the court dismissing the complaint on trial at Special Term.
Henry W. Conklin for appellant.
Charles J. Bissell for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion of Bradley, J., below.
All concur, except Haight, J., not sitting.