Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Carter Oil Co. v. Welker et al., 1942 — 317 U.S. 592 · caselaw · US
General
Carter Oil Co. v. Welker et al.
317 U.S. 592·Supreme Court of the United States·1942
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1.
Carter Oil Co. v. Welker et al.
October 19, 1942.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The judgment is reversed, per stipulation, on the authority of Tallman v. Eastern Illinois & Peoria R. Co., 379 Ill. 441, 41 N. E. 2d 537, and Vandenbark v. Owens-Illinois Co., 311 U. S. 538.
Messrs. L. O. Owen, Henry I. Green, and Harold F. Lindley for petitioner. Messrs. William M. Acton, Paul J. Wimsey, and Lawrence T. Allen for respondents.