Corporations
Elmer W. KELLEY and General Street Signal Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF SYRACUSE, Crouse-Hinds Company, and Syracuse Lighting Company, Defendants-Appellees
47 F.2d 349·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1931
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Elmer W. KELLEY and General Street Signal Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF SYRACUSE, Crouse-Hinds Company, and Syracuse Lighting Company, Defendants-Ap-pellees.
No. 186.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Jan. 19, 1931.
Harold E. Stonebraker and Sutherland & Dwyer, all of Rochester, N. Y., and Samuel E. Darby, Jr., of New York City, for appellants.
Charles Neave, of New York City, A. H. Cowie, of Syracuse, N. Y., and Henry R. Ashlon, of New York City, for appellees.
Before MANTON, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decree [47 F.(2d) 347] affirmed. ■