Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
CHERRY-BURRELL CORP. v. Daniel P. KING, Trustee of the Estate of the Davis Ice Cream Company, and W. P. Stavenger, Mortgagee, 1934 — 71 F.2d 1001 · caselaw · US
General
CHERRY-BURRELL CORP. v. Daniel P. KING, Trustee of the Estate of the Davis Ice Cream Company, and W. P. Stavenger, Mortgagee
71 F.2d 1001·United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CHERRY-BURRELL CORP. v. Daniel P. KING, Trustee of the Estate of the Davis Ice Cream Company, and W. P. Stavenger, Mortgagee.
No. 6475.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
June 6, 1934.
Treadway & Marlatt, of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant.
W. B. Heiser, of Cleveland, Ohio, and Loomis & Caris, of Ravenna, Ohio, for appellees.
No opinion filed in court balow.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Order of District Court affirmed.