Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Wilkin Kuhlmann et al., Appellants, v. The City of Brooklyn, Respondent, 1896 — 149 N.Y. 584 · caselaw · US
General
Wilkin Kuhlmann et al., Appellants, v. The City of Brooklyn, Respondent
149 N.Y. 584·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Wilkin Kuhlmann et al., Appellants, v. The City of Brooklyn, Respondent.
Kuhlman v. City of Brooklyn, 6 Misc. Rep. 429, affirmed.
(Argued April 17, 1896;
decided May 1, 1896.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the City Court of Brooklyn, entered upon an order made at the January term, 1894, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court dismissing the complaint on trial at Special Term.
Charles C. Smith for appellants.
Joseph A. Burr for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the case of Sims v. City of Brooklyn (141 N. Y. 103).
All concur.