Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
New Jersey v. New York et al., 1953 — 344 U.S. 932 · caselaw · US
General
New Jersey v. New York et al.
344 U.S. 932·Supreme Court of the United States·1953
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
February 9, 1953.
No. 5,
Original, October Term, 1950.
New Jersey v. New York et al.
Theodore D. Parsons, Attorney General, Robert Peacock, Deputy Attorney General, and Kenneth H. Murray for the State of New Jersey, complainant.
Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney General, Wendell P. Brown, Solicitor General, and Edward L. Ryan, Assistant Attorney General, for the State of New York, defendant.
Denis M. Hurley, John P. McGrath, Jeremiah M. Evarts and Richard H. Burke for the City of New York, defendant.
Robert E. Woodside, Attorney General, George G. Chandler, Bernard G. Segal, Wm. A. Schnader and Harry F. Stambaugh for the State of Pennsylvania, intervenor.
Abrgham L. Freedman for the City of Philadelphia.
[MAJORITY]
The motion of the State of New Jersey for leave to file amended and supplemental answer is granted. The motion of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for leave to file amended answer is granted. The motion of the City of Philadelphia for leave to intervene is assigned for argument on Monday, March 9, next, twenty minutes to be allowed each party appearing.