Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Mary Fiske Paget, Appellant, v. Sarah Theresa Pease et al., Impleaded, etc., Respondents, 1889 — 117 N.Y. 649 · caselaw · US
General
Mary Fiske Paget, Appellant, v. Sarah Theresa Pease et al., Impleaded, etc., Respondents
117 N.Y. 649·New York Court of Appeals·1889·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mary Fiske Paget, Appellant, v. Sarah Theresa Pease et al., Impleaded, etc., Respondents.
(Argued November 25, 1889;
decided December 10, 1889.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made July 9, 1889, which affirmed an order of Special Term, granting a motion to declare void the service of a summons upon defendants by publication.
D. C. Calvin for appellant.
John S. Melcher for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss; no opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.