Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
ROADWAY EXPRESS, INC. v. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION, 1968 — 390 U.S. 745 · caselaw · US
Tax
ROADWAY EXPRESS, INC. v. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION
390 U.S. 745·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ROADWAY EXPRESS, INC. v. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION.
No. 1225.
Decided April 29, 1968.
Nicholas Conover English for appellant.
Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Elias Abelson and Jeffrey R. Lowe, Deputy Attorneys General, for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.