Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In re Disbarment of Rosner, 1976 — 427 U.S. 656 · caselaw · US
General
In re Disbarment of Rosner
427 U.S. 656·Supreme Court of the United States·1976
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. D-22.
In re Disbarment of Rosner.
[MAJORITY]
It having been reported to the Court that Edmund Allen Rosner, of New York, N. Y., has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Judicial Department, and this Court by order of February 19, 1974 [415 U. S. 907], having suspended the said Edmund Allen Rosner from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred;
And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response thereto has expired;
It is ordered that the said Edmund Allen Rosner be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.