Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Alfred H. SEAWARD, Appellant, v. Arthur H. RICHARDS and M. Ted JACOBS, Appellees, 1928 — 24 F.2d 1021 · caselaw · US
General
Alfred H. SEAWARD, Appellant, v. Arthur H. RICHARDS and M. Ted JACOBS, Appellees
24 F.2d 1021·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1928
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Alfred H. SEAWARD, Appellant, v. Arthur H. RICHARDS and M. Ted JACOBS, Appellees.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 3, 1928.
No. 5104.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana; Louis H. Bums, Judge.
Geo. Montgomery and George B. Smart, both of New Orleans, La., for appellant.
E. Howard M’Caleb, of New Orleans, La. (E. Howard McCaleb and McCaleb & McCaleb, all of New Orleans, La., on the brief), for appellees.
Before WALKER, BRYAN, and FOSTER, Circuit Judges.
Rehearing denied May 25, 1928.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed.