Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Interstate Commerce Commission, Appellant, v. The Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Company et al., 1906 — 202 U.S. 613 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
The Interstate Commerce Commission, Appellant, v. The Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Company et al.
202 U.S. 613·Supreme Court of the United States·1906
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 216.
The Interstate Commerce Commission, Appellant, v. The Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Company et al.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio.
Argued April 10 and 11, 1906.
Decided May 21, 1906.
The Attorney General, Mr. John G. Carlisle and Mr. L. A. Shaver for appellant..
Mr. Adelbert Moot, Mr. George C. Greene, Mr. George W. Wall, Mr. George F. Brownell, Mr. Frederick W. Stevens and Mr. Edgar J. Rich for appellees.
[MAJORITY]
Decree affirmed with costs by a divided court. (Mr. Justice Holmes took no part in the consideration of this case.)