Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
W. F. Wyman, Appellant, v. Virgile Herard, 1903 — 188 U.S. 743 · caselaw · US
General
W. F. Wyman, Appellant, v. Virgile Herard
188 U.S. 743·Supreme Court of the United States·1903
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 243.
Oliver Ames et al., Trustees, et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Board of Street Commissioners of the City of Boston.
February 24, 1903.
Mr. J. II. Benton, Jr., for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Thomas M. Bahsori for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY]
In error to the Supreme J udicial Court of the State of Massachusetts.
Dismissed, per stipulation.