General
In the Matter of the Petition of Clinton BROME for a Writ of Prohibition and a Writ of Mandamus
73 F.2d 992·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Petition of Clinton BROME for a Writ of Prohibition and a Writ of Mandamus.
No. 376, Original.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Oct. 6, 1934.
Amos Thomas and Clinton Brome, both •of Omaha, Neb., for petitioner.
M. E. Culhane, of Minneapolis, Minn., D. S. Elliott, of Sioux Falls, S. D., and Olaf Eidem, of Brookings, S. D., for respondent.
[MAJORITY — PEE CUEIAM.]
PEE CUEIAM.
Motion for leave to file petition dismissed without costs to either party in this court ■on motion of petitioner.