Contracts · MBE-tested
United States v. Atlantic Refining Co. et al.
359 U.S. 952·Supreme Court of the United States·1959
Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 210.
United States v. Atlantic Refining Co. et al.
Solicitor General Rankin on the motion.
[MAJORITY]
The motion to remand is granted and the cause is remanded to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia insofar as it pertains to the orders of said court of March 26, 1958, involving the Tidal Pipe Line Company, Tidewater Oil Company, Service Pipe Line Company, and Standard Oil Company (Indiana).
Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.