Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
KALAMAZOO CITY SAVINGS BANK OF KALAMAZOO, MICH., v. MICHIGAN TRUST COMPANY, Receiver of Worden Grocer Company, 1926 — 15 F.2d 1014 · caselaw · US
General
KALAMAZOO CITY SAVINGS BANK OF KALAMAZOO, MICH., v. MICHIGAN TRUST COMPANY, Receiver of Worden Grocer Company
15 F.2d 1014·United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·1926
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
KALAMAZOO CITY SAVINGS BANK OF KALAMAZOO, MICH., v. MICHIGAN TRUST COMPANY, Receiver of Worden Grocer Company.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
November 3, 1926.)
No. 4786.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Michigan.
Adams & Van Horn, of Kalamazoo, Mich., for appellant.
Travis, Merrick, Warner & Johnson, of Grand Rapids, Mich., for appellee.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Docketed and dismissed pursuant to stipulation of counsel.