General
E. W. KRAMER, Appellant, v. Hannah E. FORBES et al., Appellees
65 F.2d 1018·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
E. W. KRAMER, Appellant, v. Hannah E. FORBES et al., Appellees.
No. 7231.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
July 27, 1933.
Peirson M. Hall, U. S. Atty., and Lewis M. Andrews, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Los Angeles, Cal., and Everts, Ewing, Wild So Everts and Dan F. Conway, all of Fresno, Cal., for appellant.
Borton So Petrini, of Bakersfield, Cal'., for appellees.
Before SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge, and NORCROSS, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon stipulation of counsel for respective parties, ordered appeal dismissed; mandate forthwith.