Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Henry Melville Walker, Appellant, v. Mary W. Harriman, Executrix of Edward H. Harriman, Deceased, 1911 — 220 U.S. 606 · caselaw · US
General
Henry Melville Walker, Appellant, v. Mary W. Harriman, Executrix of Edward H. Harriman, Deceased
220 U.S. 606·Supreme Court of the United States·1911
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 147.
Henry Melville Walker, Appellant, v. Mary W. Harriman, Executrix of Edward H. Harriman, Deceased.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Argued April 25, 1911.
Decided May 15, 1911.
Mr. B. C. Chetwood for the appellant. Mr. Maxwell Evarts for the appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Southern Railway Co. v. Postal Telegraph Cable Company, 179 U. S. 641.