Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
California ex rel. Brown, Attorney General, et al. v. St. Louis Union Trust Co., 1955 — 348 U.S. 932 · caselaw · US
General
California ex rel. Brown, Attorney General, et al. v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.
348 U.S. 93275 S. Ct. 354·Supreme Court of the United States·1955
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
February 7, 1955.
No. 32.
California ex rel. Brown, Attorney General, et al. v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.
Walter H. Miller argued the cause for petitioners.
With him on the brief were Ed mund O. Brown, Attorney General of California, and Elizabeth Miller, Deputy Attorney General.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Certiorari, 348 U. S. 808, to the St. Louis Court of Appeals of Missouri. Argued January 31, 1955. Decided February 7, 1955.
Per Curiam:
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
Milton Yawitz argued the cause for respondent.
With him on the brief was Chas. D. Long.