Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp. v. Hudson Rapid Tubes Corp., 1968 — 390 U.S. 1002 · caselaw · US
General
Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp. v. Hudson Rapid Tubes Corp.
390 U.S. 1002·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1054.
Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp. v. Hudson Rapid Tubes Corp.
Sidney Goldstein, Joseph Lesser, Milton H. Pachter, Whitney North Seymour, John A. Guzzetta and Arthur I. Settles for petitioner. David W. Peck and L. Robert Driver, Jr., for respondent. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General, Joseph A. Hoffman, First Assistant Attorney General, and Elias Abelson, David A. Bied-erman and Arthur Abba Goldberg, Deputy Attorneys General, for the State of New Jersey, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
[MAJORITY]
Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.