Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Spencer S. Peak, Respondent, v. Francis Lemon et al., Appellants, 1872 — 49 N.Y. 666 · caselaw · US
General
Spencer S. Peak, Respondent, v. Francis Lemon et al., Appellants
49 N.Y. 666·New York Court of Appeals·1872·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Spencer S. Peak, Respondent, v. Francis Lemon et al., Appellants.
(Argued April 19, 1872;
decided April 23, 1872.)
Amasa J. Parher for the appellants.
A. Storrs for the respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm. No opinion.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.