Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
CHASE v. PHILLIPS, 1910 — 216 U.S. 616 · caselaw · US
General
CHASE v. PHILLIPS
216 U.S. 616·Supreme Court of the United States·1910
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CHASE v. PHILLIPS.
ERROR TO THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OP THE STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS.
No. 724.
Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted March 14, 1910.
Decided March 21, 1910.
Writ of error to review 201 Massachusetts, 444, dismissed, without opinion, for the want'of jurisdiction.
Mr. Joseph H. Soliday,'Mr. Richard Y. FitzGerald, and Mr. Frederic D. McKenney for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. Moorfield Storey and Mr. Ezra Ripley Thayer for the defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction.