Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Jennie K. Hamilton, Appellant, v. Edwin L. Patrick et al., Respondents, 1896 — 149 N.Y. 580 · caselaw · US
General
Jennie K. Hamilton, Appellant, v. Edwin L. Patrick et al., Respondents
149 N.Y. 580·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Jennie K. Hamilton, Appellant, v. Edwin L. Patrick et al., Respondents.
Hamilton v. Patrick. 62 Hun, 74, affirmed.
(Argued April 10, 1896;
decided April 28, 1896.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, made November 30, 1391, and amended September 13, 1892, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term and granted a new trial.
Austen G. Fox and A. D. Wait for appellant.
Charles E. Patterson, Henry Edwin Tremain and John Stewart Durand for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs, on prevailing opinion below, and judgment absolute ordered against the plaintiff on the stipulation.
All concur.