Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Application of the City of Rochester, Respondent, to Acquire Certain Lands in the Town of Brighton. Edna C. Cobb, Appellant, 1906 — 183 N.Y. 577 · caselaw · US
Corporations
In the Matter of the Application of the City of Rochester, Respondent, to Acquire Certain Lands in the Town of Brighton. Edna C. Cobb, Appellant
183 N.Y. 577·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of the City of Rochester, Respondent, to Acquire Certain Lands in the Town of Brighton. Edna C. Cobb, Appellant.
(Argued January 9, 1906;
decided January 23, 1906.)
Matter of City of Rochester, 108 App. Div. 360, appeal dismissed.
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered October 20, 1905, which affirmed an order of the Monroe County Court granting to the appellant herein costs and an additional allowance in the above-entitled proceeding.
William F. Lynn for appellant.
W. W. Webb, Corporation Counsel (Chester F. Kiehel of counsel), for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Haight, Vann, Werner and Willard Bartlett, JJ. Not sitting: Hiscocic, J.