Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Walling, Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division, U. S. Department of Labor, v. Goldblatt Brothers, Inc., 1943 — 318 U.S. 757 · caselaw · US
General
Walling, Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division, U. S. Department of Labor, v. Goldblatt Brothers, Inc.
318 U.S. 757·Supreme Court of the United States·1943
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 418.
Walling, Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division, U. S. Department of Labor, v. Goldblatt Brothers, Inc.
February 1, 1943.
Solicitor General Fahy and Mr. Irving J. Levy for petitioner. Messrs. Abram N. Pritzker and Stanford Clinton for respondent. Mr. Charles B. Rugg filed a brief on behalf of the American Retail Federation, as, amicus curiae, urging denial of the petition.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.