Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
California et al. v. Michigan State Board of Escheats et al., 1947 — 332 U.S. 764 · caselaw · US
General
California et al. v. Michigan State Board of Escheats et al.
332 U.S. 764·Supreme Court of the United States·1947
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 175.
California et al. v. Michigan State Board of Escheats et al.
Fred N. Howser, Attorney General of California, Everett W. Mattoon, Deputy Attorney General, and Lloyd T. Chockley for petitioners.
[MAJORITY]
Certiorari denied.
Eugene F. Black, Attorney General of Michigan, Edmund E. Shepherd, Solicitor General, and Daniel J. O’Hara, Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.