Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Bank of the United States and Samuel W. Venables's Executors vs. John T. Swan, 1830 — 28 U.S. 68 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
The Bank of the United States and Samuel W. Venables's Executors vs. John T. Swan
28 U.S. 683 Pet. 68·Supreme Court of the United States·1830
Per Mr Chief Justice Marshall.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Bank of the United States and Samuel W. Venables’s Executors vs. John T. Swan.
Where an appeal has Been dismissed, the appellant having omitted to file a transcript of the record within the time required by the rule of court, an official certificate of the dismissal of the appeal may not be given by the clerk during the term. The appellant may file the transcript with the clerk during the term, and move to have the appeal reinstated.. To allow such a certificate would be to prejudge such a motion.
[MAJORITY]
ON consideration of the motion made by Mr Wirt, of counsel for the appellee, for leave to take from the office of the clerk of this court, before the adjournment of the present term of this court, an official certificate of the dismissal of this appeal, dismissed last Saturday, being the 30th of January, of the present term of this court:
It is ordered that the said motion be overruled; and that the leave prayed for be refused; as under the practice of this court, the appellants would have a right during the present term to lodge a transcript of the record of said appeal with the clerk of this court, and move to have the appeal reinstated ; whereas to grant the present prayer or motion would be tó prejudge such a motion.
Per Mr Chief Justice Marshall.