Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lillie Kleng, Appellant, v. The City of Buffalo, Respondent, 1898 — 156 N.Y. 700 · caselaw · US
General
Lillie Kleng, Appellant, v. The City of Buffalo, Respondent
156 N.Y. 700·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Lillie Kleng, Appellant, v. The City of Buffalo, Respondent.
Kleng v. Oity of Buffalo, 72 Hun, 541, affirmed.
(Argued June 24, 1898;
decided October 4, 1898.)
Appeal from an order of the late General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered November 24, 1893, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and granting a new trial.
Wallace Thayer for appellant.
C. V. Kéllany and W. H. Cuddeback for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for defendant on the stipulation, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.