General
Robert D. Vroom, Respondent, v. Russell Sage, Appellant
184 N.Y. 542·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Robert D. Vroom, Respondent, v. Russell Sage, Appellant.
Vroom v. Sage, 100 App. Div. 285, affirmed.
(Argued February 1, 1906;
decided February 27, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 16, 1905, affirming a judgment.in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
George W. Wicker sham,, Sidney Smith and Charles A. Gardiner for appellant.
Henry D. Hotchkiss for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Werner, Hisoook and Chase, JJ.